SJWs have a Wiki, and Bronies have a page by


It was a post that brought some bronies to tears. Not out of sorrow of course, but out of intense laughter. Dropped off to us in the Horse News tip jar, was a link to a site called "sjwiki.org", which is the Social Justice Warrior's equivalent to Encyclopedia Dramatica. That's right, SJW's have a Wiki, and Bronies get their own page. 

Let's take a look at what the braintrust has to say.

We're greeted at first by an enormous pink Trigger Warning sign, just so that readers know they might get offended by doing something they aren't used to doing - reading.

The article is subdivided into 9 sections; The Show, The Fandom, The Documentary, Save Derpy, Down with Molestia, Feminist Ponies, See Also, External Links, and References.

Naturally the only things this wiki is concerned with is the various levels of impact that SJWs have had in the brony community. The whole thing is simply riddled with gold however.

One such nugget of hilarity comes from the very introduction, which concludes with the statement:
"Unfortunately, the adult male fandom is a toxic misogynistic community with a persecution complex."

Right there you know where this ship is headed, and you strap on a better pair of sides.

The "The Fandom" section contains this nugget of SJW intel

"Despite the feminist nature of the show, the fandom has become highly infamous for attracting a large audience of misogynist men's rights activists (MRAs). Anti-feminist sentiment is very common on brony sites and many MRAs and libertarians have characters from the show or fanon as their profile picture on websites. Racism, homophobia, transphobia and queerphobia are also common sights in the fandom."

The rest of the article continues in kind.


Such Fan Favorites as Yamino and PinkiePony even get their own mentions in the article, which continues on the typical "Bronies-R-Bad-Cuz-Reasons" tirade we've come to expect as a neverending source of entertainment.

The last few sections seem like a punchline to the long setup, where they cite Gianna DeCarlo, as a source of reliable information. You may remember Gianna for being that intern at the shitrag called "The City Paper" in Baltimore Maryland, who wrote a review of Bronycon so poorly, that it makes Horse News look like it deserves a Pulitzer.

We hadn't heard anything out of Gianna in a few months, so we decided to check up on her.


As we expected, little has changed, as she is overjoyed to be a yellow journalist and one day aspires to write tales of terrorist attacks against groups she doesn't like. You may be surprised to know that she just graduated college, but less shocked to know she was a Womens Studies student.


We expect great things from this blight on the Fourth Estate.
We at Horse News have lots to say about bronies and the Social Justice Bowel Movement, so we decided to sign up for an account.



 Apparently, they don't trust people they might not agree with though. They personally review every application for accounts (they even have a spot to submit your RESUME). This ensures that there is no threat of balance whatsoever.



If you get bored, be sure to take a look around SJWiki, it's sure to wreck your sides. A great place to start would be the 4chan entry, which actually lists Wikipedia - another wiki - as a source of information.



Comments (49)

  1. My God, this is beautiful. If it's a wiki, does that mean anyone can edit it? I got me some haters to antagonize.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Something tells me you have to register to edit.

      Delete
    2. You do, so here's an idea: Make a blog, reblog a bunch of typical crap SJWs posts, then go apply for membership. The staff will do a background check, think you're on their side, and them BAM! NIGGER FAGGOTS IN FEDORAS EVERYWHERE!

      Also, be sure to dump on Superwholock. 95% of SJWs nowadays are teenage yaoi fangirls who love that shit.

      Delete
  2. At least they got the origin of brony right. So many tumblrites thing it's from /b/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, although to be exact the term 'brony' wasn't created on 4chan, but rather on plus4chan.

      Delete
  3. So... who WROTE the articles?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ass-blasted tumblr users, probably.

      Delete
  4. Wait wait wait.
    This place is called "sjwiki"
    I REFUSE to believe any of the people who deserve the label of "sjw" would USE it to promote themselves, let alone make a wiki based on this.

    This is alllll a huge false flag done by one of us, ain't it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read more closely. It says "sj wiki," not "sjw wiki." Besides, SJWs have been trying to "reclaim" the term for a while now, the same way that some radfems call themselves feminazis.

      And all the content in the article is completely par for the course for tumblr SJWs. If it wasn't written by one, it may as well have been, because it's not an exaggeration or misrepresentation in the least.

      Delete
    2. "Reclaiming" SJW is like conservatives "reclaiming" the word "fascist" or liberals "reclaiming" the word "socialist".

      But it's not even that! They're just straight-up approriating everything used to describe them! "Strawman", "toxic", we used those words to describe these people! I bet that you could just make up a nonsense word like "knocknoggin" or "fiddlewit" and if you used it to insult them, they'd totally steal that shit.

      Delete
    3. The term "Social Justice Warrior" sounds like one who fights for social justice, which is just fine for some people—and it's what some people actually want to do. I think the term SJW only really works as an effective pejorative if the target understands (and actually cares) that it's a term meant to imply heavy sarcasm, as it actually means "butthurt-peddling non-activist" or "hypocritical activist-in-name-only pest", or "awful people who give actual activists a bad name".

      Delete
    4. Anon 3 you are a motherfucking idiot, go throw yourself under some tracks like that other faggot brony.
      Those are completely different ideologies, something even fucking /pol/ knows!

      Delete
  5. That's sad for the poor brainwashed kids.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Horse News, you should make it your New Year's resolution to earn yourself a spot on this distinguished wiki.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm not laughing. I'm sad. I'm sad that these people even felt that this was necessary. Why the need to make a WIKI to spread their bullshit? Why the need for this level of exclusivity to block out any dissenting opinions? Tumblr is ALREADY a goddamn echo chamber, and they ALREADY shut off their brains and ignore us when presented with evidence that they're fucktards. I don't see how this accomplishes anything new for them.

    The only explanation I can fathom is that whoever founded it is actually SUCH a control freak that they can't even tolerate the EXISTENCE of independent thought other than their own, and are trying to create an environment where that can pretend that everybody in the world agrees with them. If we lived in a comic book universe, these people would be mad scientists, and this wiki they're building would be a giant mind control ray.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm suddenly reminded of Conservapedia, and now I have the most splendiferous idea: Make a Conservapedia article on SJWiki, tell SJWiki about it, then grab some popcorn, sit back, and watch the greatest shitshow on Earth.

      Delete
    2. If you do this, anon, you will be my hero.

      Delete
  8. "The first prominent piece of fanon in the community manifested itself in a background pony who appeared cross-eyed due to an animation error. The fandom on /co/ assumed she was mentally challenged because of that and nicknamed her "Derpy Hooves"."

    >Assumed she was mentally challenged because of that
    No they did not.

    Among other things there are are few other items that are suspiciously omitted. Such as the removal of her name from the episode.

    This is ridiculous?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm so glad they didn't generalize or assume the worst of everyone they're writing about in any way in their article.

    I almost made it all the way through typing that with a straight face.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Reading the 4chan article. How come /v/ is listed amongst the 'very harmful' boards and we're merely "moderately harmful"? What do we lack that they have?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GamerGate.

      As bad as the MRA rape apologist bronies are, GamerGate become the polar opposite of social justice after a couple weeks and /v/ turned into Tumblr for retards on the other end of the spectrum.

      Delete
    2. You know people speak of these MRA rape apologist bronies ,when more often than not they're boogeymen. Rarely seen but as soon as you disagree with someone on an issue you're accused of being one.

      Delete
    3. We've got our semen jar champion though!

      Should we formally appeal to the SJWiki board of rating to correct their mistake? H-N, can you get on that? We cannot allow such inaccuracies to take place, especially not on the Internetz.

      Delete
    4. It's funny, really.

      The media has several times reported on young kids who bullied for being bronies, the community has plenty of LGBT and mentally challenged people (or in other words, vulnerable minorities), the rare actual bigots to rise from the fandom like RealityCheck or that George Cain guy are a subject of universal mockery, we're well-known for our involvement in charity work (even in /mlp/'s side of the fandom), outside sources like the documentaries are always talking about how we're making social progress by defying gender stereotypes, and we're all united by affection for a show that was created by a prominent feminist, who is herself the one individual that the fandom respects most.

      You would've thought that SJWs would consider bronies one of the more harmless fandoms out there, and that they'd instead be focusing their attention on some opposite extreme, like Stormfront, or the actual MRA. And yet they consider us the big problem and propagate this tired stereotype of the greasy (And it's always that exact word, "greasy") neckbeard MRA rape apologist brony, which I'm not even sure is actually based on any real individuals. I honestly don't understand where this all came from, other than the obvious answer of misandry.

      Delete
    5. Misandry is the simple answer and the root to all of this, but another aspect to it is the feminist fanbase's ludicrous sense of personal entitlement to the show. A specific recurring undertone in many of their comments is the sentiment that men are somehow defiling the show by watching it or (heaven forfend) jacking off to it. In these people's minds, MLP is *exclusively* for girls; it is *their show* and nobody else's and a man watching it is basically trespassing (I have seen it compared to *British colonialism* of all the stupid things). So naturally they react by throwing their toys out of the pram and screaming about how everybody else are horrible for expecting them to share something that never belonged to them to begin with.

      Delete
    6. I like this explanation, and if you don't mind, I'll be quoting you whenever this discussion comes up in future.

      Delete
    7. What's even better is that [s4s] is apparently moderately harmful.

      They obviously can't look past pr0n, or were too triggered by a mention of 4chan to look at anything :P

      Delete
  11. This gives a whole new meaning to wikiality

    ReplyDelete
  12. Holy shit, this whole wiki is like a liberal Conservapedia. It's like someone took RationalWiki, did away with any illusion of rationality, and put up a huge sign that reads "PLEASE TROLL THIS SITE".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know, right? The whole thing is bias as shit, too.

      Delete
  13. ohhhh shit

    their 4chan article refers to /l/ as a board for child pornography

    child pornography laws not covering animation/drawings last I checked in the United States, could that be construed as actual libel?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm rather surprised at the short length of their tumblr article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not surprised at all. Tumblr is such a festering pit of cancer that not even they can put a positive bullshit spin on it. It was founded by a high school drop-out, it has cost Yahoo a fortune, and it has the most vile, digusting, ACTUALLY toxic environment this side of Stormfront. Users regularly make overt death threats and calls to violence aimed at people based on race/gender/sexuality, mock and harass rape victims when they don't behave like fanfic stereotypes, and are single-handedly destroying decades worth of social progress because they are bored and want to pretend to be civil rights activists because that's what's trendy.

      They did get one thing perfectly right, though: "arguably Tumblr is most similar in culture to LiveJournal"

      Delete
  15. > Article about how bronies are terrible MRA dudebro misogynists who deliberately profane an innocent TV show for girls specifically because they hate feminists

    > Same article talks about bronies' "persecution complex"

    There's enough projection here to light up a movie screen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hate feminists = MRA dudebro misogynist
      kek

      Fucking SJWs will never learn.

      Delete
    2. If you mean projection on the part of twits getting butthurt and making a wiki page talking about persecution complexes, then yes, you're quite correct.

      Delete
  16. Dear tumblr retards,

    You DO know that "social justice warrior” was created as and still is a pejorative term, right?

    If not, congrats, you're as stupid as you come off as on your blogs.

    ReplyDelete
  17. There are no words to describe how delusional they are...or not enough words to properly explain how delusional they are.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sweet Jesus. At this rate, SJWs are going to become a walking punchline...as if they weren't one already.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Both sides of the argument are teenagers spending too much time on the internet and arguing about meaningless shit. But after all it's a kids show so it's hardly surprising.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, pal, this isn't GamerGate!

      Delete
  20. "...misogynist men's rights activists (MRAs). Anti-feminist sentiment is very common on brony sites and many MRAs and libertarians have characters from the show or fanon as their profile picture on websites. Racism, homophobia, transphobia and queerphobia are also common sights in the fandom."

    All of this is alleged. They call everyone that disagrees with them this shit, it's classic SJW garbage response. It's usually written in all all caps followed by a "KILL YOURSELF SHITLORD I HOPE YOUR MOTHER GETS CANCER!!1!!" Then you might get a dead rat mailed to you a day later.

    And persecution complex? They have several blogs named shit like "kill all bronies." The whole article is full of lies and half truths, are they this fucking stupid?

    And what's the deal with libertarians? As far as I know a libertarian believes in individual rights, how is that a bad thing? I've heard SJW make references to them before, implying anyone who is one ios a "bad person," which always makes me giggle because they are clearly completely unself aware fuck nuggets if they think they have the right to call anyone a bad person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe the idea of SJWs hating Libertarians is because Libertarians stand for personal responsibility and want social welfare removed, and many SJWs sitting on their ass with a "condishun" take this as an attack on their honey pot. They'd have to get real jobs.

      Delete
    2. SJWs are the liberal equivilent of neo-cons. Libertarians are right-wingers who don't pretend to give a shit about morality and religion, and will shit all over civil rights for their own personal rights. SJWs are in love with this fantasy idea of civil rights activitism, so it's only natural SJWs hate libertarians.

      And hey, you know how many libertarian bronies I've seen? One, and he was just as cringeworthy as you'd expect anyone calling themselves a "libertarian brony" to be (his OC had a goddamn bumblebee color scheme). But you know how many MRAs I've seen that were actually male?

      MOTHERFUCKING NONE OF THEM!

      I've been noticing for a couple years now that everyone calling themselves an "MRA" is an ex-feminist woman who thinks men need to get in touch with their emotions and shit. They are the equivilent of male feminists. They're nice gals! Beta females! It's hilarious!

      Delete
  21. Truly, reality is funnier than fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  22. it's even funnier that skwiki is hosted and maintained by a sexual predator known for abusing multiple women, not to mention "gender appropriating"

    ReplyDelete
  23. Okay... I found this funny when I skimmed it, but I just went back and re-read the 4chan article. I lost my shit.

    "The image boards called /b/, /pol/, /lgbt/, /v/, /s4s/, /gif/, /soc/, /r9k/, /tv/, and /jp/ are where the majority of the racism is encountered. Nevertheless, it is present throughout almost every board."

    >/s4s/
    >racist

    Only if /pol/'s having a bad day...

    ReplyDelete
  24. I wish I had an account. I would simply add "In conclusion, this page is complete bullshit, and should not be taken seriously under any circumstances." to the end.

    ReplyDelete